On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 01:43:05 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Saturday, July 18, 2015 at 01:58:09 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > > On 25 June 2015 at 16:51, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >> Some functions called by mkimage would like to know the output file > > >> size. Initially this is the same as the input file size, but it may be > > >> affected by adding headers, etc. > > >> > > >> Add this information to the image parameters. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > >> --- > > > > > > Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> > > > > Applied to u-boot-dm. > > Hi, > > This breaks all i.MX23 and i.MX28 boards, try building for example the > mx28evk board, u-boot.sb target: > > $ make mx28evk_defconfig > $ make u-boot.sb > [...] > LD spl/lib/built-in.o > LDS spl/u-boot-spl.lds > LD spl/u-boot-spl > OBJCOPY spl/u-boot-spl.bin > CFG spl/u-boot-spl.cfg > MKIMAGE u-boot.sb > ./tools/mkimage: Can't open (null): Bad address > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/Makefile:82: recipe for target 'u-boot.sb' > failed make[1]: *** [u-boot.sb] Error 1 > Makefile:989: recipe for target 'u-boot.sb' failed > make: *** [u-boot.sb] Error 2 > > Shall I look into it or do you already have a patch ? :)
Patch is out and the patch is most certainly correct. On the other hand, is my understanding correct that this patch makes passing the -d option to mkimage mandatory ? It was optional before this patch I believe. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
