Hi Simon, On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Add support for building U-Boot as an EFI application with a .efi suffix. > This can be loaded by EFI provided that EFI has the same bit width (32- > or 64-bit) as U-Boot. This unfortunate limitation is imposed by EFI. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > --- > > Makefile | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index e0218b3..91ebc2e 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -752,6 +752,7 @@ ifneq ($(CONFIG_SPL_TARGET),) > ALL-$(CONFIG_SPL) += $(CONFIG_SPL_TARGET:"%"=%) > endif > ALL-$(CONFIG_REMAKE_ELF) += u-boot.elf > +ALL-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EFI) += u-boot.efi
Can we use u-boot-app.efi? > > ifneq ($(BUILD_ROM),) > ALL-$(CONFIG_X86_RESET_VECTOR) += u-boot.rom > @@ -1080,6 +1081,10 @@ u-boot-dtb-tegra.bin: u-boot-nodtb-tegra.bin > dts/dt.dtb FORCE > endif > endif > > +OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot.efi := $(OBJCOPYFLAGS_EFI) Where is OBJCOPYFLAGS_EFI introduced? Can we move that into this patch? > +u-boot.efi: u-boot FORCE > + $(call if_changed,zobjcopy) > + > u-boot-img.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin u-boot.img FORCE > $(call if_changed,cat) > > -- Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
