Hi Marek,
> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
>
> This is the same as f72d8320b605 "usb: ci_udc: fix warnings on 64-bit
> builds", but more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> index aadff42a9cdc..993be315a8cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/ci_udc.c
> @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static void ci_flush_qtd(int ep_num)
> */
> static void ci_flush_td(struct ept_queue_item *td)
> {
> - const uint32_t start = (uint32_t)td;
> - const uint32_t end = (uint32_t) td + ILIST_ENT_SZ;
> + const unsigned long start = (unsigned long)td;
> + const unsigned long end = (unsigned long)td + ILIST_ENT_SZ;
> flush_dcache_range(start, end);
> }
>
> @@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static void ci_invalidate_qtd(int ep_num)
> */
> static void ci_invalidate_td(struct ept_queue_item *td)
> {
> - const uint32_t start = (uint32_t)td;
> - const uint32_t end = start + ILIST_ENT_SZ;
> + const unsigned long start = (unsigned long)td;
> + const unsigned long end = start + ILIST_ENT_SZ;
> invalidate_dcache_range(start, end);
> }
>
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static void ci_ep_submit_next_request(struct
> ci_ep *ci_ep) if (len) {
> qtd = (struct ept_queue_item *)
> memalign(ILIST_ALIGN, ILIST_ENT_SZ);
> - dtd->next = (uint32_t)qtd;
> + dtd->next = (unsigned long)qtd;
> dtd = qtd;
> memset(dtd, 0, ILIST_ENT_SZ);
> }
> @@ -503,10 +503,10 @@ static void ci_ep_submit_next_request(struct
> ci_ep *ci_ep)
> ci_flush_qtd(num);
>
> - item = (struct ept_queue_item *)head->next;
> + item = (struct ept_queue_item *)(unsigned long)head->next;
> while (item->next != TERMINATE) {
> - ci_flush_td((struct ept_queue_item *)item->next);
> - item = (struct ept_queue_item *)item->next;
> + ci_flush_td((struct ept_queue_item *)(unsigned
> long)item->next);
> + item = (struct ept_queue_item *)(unsigned
> long)item->next; }
>
> DBG("ept%d %s queue len %x, req %p, buffer %p\n",
> @@ -594,7 +594,8 @@ static void handle_ep_complete(struct ci_ep
> *ci_ep) printf("EP%d/%s FAIL info=%x pg0=%x\n",
> num, in ? "in" : "out", item->info,
> item->page0); if (j != ci_req->dtd_count - 1)
> - next_td = (struct ept_queue_item
> *)item->next;
> + next_td = (struct ept_queue_item *)(unsigned
> long)
> + item->next;
> if (j != 0)
> free(item);
> }
Should I take the patch to -dfu tree?
--
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
