2009/7/11 Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de>:
> Dear HeungJun Kim,
>
> In message <350d1ec30906250108q5949e337neb54520d6773f...@mail.gmail.com> you
> wrote:
>> This patch initializes DRAM memory, OneNAND, & Board specific functions.
>> Also, it includes SMDKC100 configuration file & modification of Makefile.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: HeungJun, Kim <riverful....@samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Makefile | 5 +
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/Makefile | 54 +++++++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/config.mk | 24 +++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/lowlevel_init.S | 215 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/mem_setup.S | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/onenand.c | 78 ++++++++++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/smdkc100.c | 70 +++++++++
>> board/samsung/smdkc100/u-boot.lds | 63 ++++++++
>> include/configs/s5pc100_smdkc100.h | 244
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 9 files changed, 950 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/config.mk
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/lowlevel_init.S
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/mem_setup.S
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/onenand.c
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/smdkc100.c
>> create mode 100644 board/samsung/smdkc100/u-boot.lds
>> create mode 100644 include/configs/s5pc100_smdkc100.h
>
> MAINTAINERS entry missing.
>
>> diff --git a/board/samsung/smdkc100/onenand.c
>> b/board/samsung/smdkc100/onenand.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..70105a6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/board/samsung/smdkc100/onenand.c
> ...
>> +#define DPRINTK(format, args...) \
>> +do { \
>> + printk("%s[%d]: " format "\n", __func__, __LINE__, ##args); \
>> +} while (0)
>
> Macro unused in this file, so please do not add dead code. Also,
> rather use debug().
>
>
>> +int dram_init(void)
>> +{
>> + DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>> +
>> + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM_1;
>> + gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = PHYS_SDRAM_1_SIZE;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> Why not using get_ram_size() for auto-detection and testing?
>
>> +void raise(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>
> Why would that be needed?
>
Actually this function is workaround.
because of undefined reference error
/opt/toolchains/arm-2008q3/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.3.2/libgcc.a(_dvmd_lnx.o):
In function `__aeabi_ldiv0':
(.text+0x8): undefined reference to `raise'
I want to solve it but can't find the reason yet.
How i can fix this problem?
thanks
--
from. prom.
www.promsoft.net
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
