On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 14:53 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello Vladimir,
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:33:46 +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy <v...@mleia.com>
> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_nand_slc.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_nand_slc.c
> > new file mode 100644
>
> > +int board_nand_init(struct nand_chip *lpc32xx_chip)
> > +{
> > + lpc32xx_chip->IO_ADDR_R = &lpc32xx_nand_slc_registers->data;
> > + lpc32xx_chip->IO_ADDR_W = &lpc32xx_nand_slc_registers->data;
>
> Consistent with my comment re nand_simpl.c, I think that the two
> assignments above are incorrect since the data register may not provide
> general access to the NAND's I/O lines, and is not 8-bit accessible
> even though the NAND is 8-bit wide.
>
> If Scott give his go, though, disregard my comment.
I agree with Albert -- if you need custom accessors, there's no benefit to
using IO_ADDR_R/W, and it could make it harder to debug if some user of
IO_ADDR_R/W is missed.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
