On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 12:32 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:42:00 -0500 > Peter Tyser <pty...@xes-inc.com> wrote: > > > > I'm assuming Kim would prefer not to use DMA and thus this patch should > > be discarded. > > yeah, I prefer speed :)
It looked like Ira tested using the DDR controller for initialization and it was ~4x as fast as the CPU method. If someone out there in 83xx land is looking to shave a few ms off their boot time (and they use ECC) it shouldn't be that hard to add support for the CONFIG_ECC_INIT_VIA_DDRCONTROLLER similar to the 85xx and 86xx architectures. > > Kim, let me know if this is the case and I'll resubmit a patch just to > > fix the build error. Patches 2 and 3 are still applicable even if we > > discard patch 1. > > ok > > WD, please feel free to apply the fix, otherwise I'll have a pull > request for you coming up. I'll submit a patch just fixing the build error shortly. Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot