On 6/29/2015 5:26 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 29 June 2015 at 14:45, Haikun Wang <haikun.w...@freescale.com> wrote:
>> From: Haikun Wang <haikun.w...@freescale.com>
>>
>> sst25wf040b doesn't support Auto Address Increment Programming command.
>> Remove SST_WR flag.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haikun Wang <b53...@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Remove extra line
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> index c12e8c6..4a4a3af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] =
>> {
>> {"SST25WF010", 0xbf2502, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 2, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>> {"SST25WF020", 0xbf2503, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 4, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>> {"SST25WF040", 0xbf2504, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 8, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>> - {"SST25WF040B", 0x621613, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 8, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>> + {"SST25WF040B", 0x621613, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 8, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K},
>
> Tested-by: ?
>
>> {"SST25WF080", 0xbf2505, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 16, RD_NORM,
>> SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>> #endif
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_WINBOND /* WINBOND */
>> --
>> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
>>
>
> thanks!
>
Verified on LS2085AQDS board.
Tested-by: Haikun Wang <haikun.w...@freescale.com>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
