Hi Peng, On 10/06/2015 12:01, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> +#define is_mx6dqp() ((is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || \ >>> + is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) && \ >>> + (is_soc_rev(CHIP_REV_2_0) >= 0)) >>> + >> >> As "insider" you could better explain me: it looks like there will be >> not a Quad/Dual with an increased chip revision. The new chip revision >> for i.MX6 is really the QP (P=perfect, as I see some workaround can be >> removed !) >> >> Is it correct ? Else this conflicts if a 6Q with a revision > 2 will be >> released. > P mean plus. I know, it was only a joke ;-). There is not "perfect" SOC. > It is from 6Q, since ic did not give new chip id for id, we use > revision. This is ok now until a 6Q with revision 2 or greater will be released. Then there is a conflict and u-boot cannot identify a 6QP from a 6Q. But it is still ok if Freescale will *never* plan to release a newer 6Q. Is it ? Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
