Dear Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Dirk Behme, > > In message <4a59e6b3.1070...@googlemail.com> you wrote: >> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >>>>> diff --git a/board/omap3/kboc/kboc.h b/board/omap3/kboc/kboc.h >>> please create you own vendor dirent >> NACK. We use board/omap3/<board>/<board>.h syntax. So this is fine. >> Everything else would make it inconsistent. > > I'm not sure what you mean by "we" here.
Most probably the maintainers of all existing board/omap3/* and board/davinci/* boards ;) > The rus is that a vendor > directory shall be used when a company supports any significaant > number (say, more than 2...3) of boards. So when for example company > FOO who already have other boards in board/foo/* releases their first > OMAP3 board, it will naturally go into board/foo/ Yes, ok, fine. I understood Jean-Christophe that he wants board/omap3/<vendor> and this is what I doesn't like. At least not for the first board of a company. If they, later, add some additional (OMAP3) boards, moving then to board/omap3/<vendor>/<board_A>/, board/omap3/<vendor>/<board_B>/ etc would be fine, though. But please don't make the currently used schema inconsistent just for one (the first) board (not knowing if there ever will be an additional one). Best regards Dirk _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
