Hello
I have followed doc/README.generic-board and simply adding
CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD does the trick.
So far it has build with no warnings for:
ml507
ml507_flash
xilinx-ppc440-generic
v5fx30teval
and I have run it on the ml507 with no issues (is the only hw I have
with me this week, but it is VERY similar to the others):
Simply adding CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD to the .h file works perfectly
As you can see from here:
U-Boot 2015.07-rc1-00091-g698a12bef9e7-dirty (May 12 2015 - 10:14:15)
CPU: IBM PowerPC 440x5 VIRTEX5 at 400 MHz (PLB=100 OPB=8 EBC=67)
32 KiB I-Cache 32 KiB D-Cache
DRAM: 256 MiB
Flash: 32 MiB
*** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
U-Boot is up and runnining
ml507:/#
Regarding xilinx-ppc404 and fx12mm
It also builds ok, but I have no access to an fx12mm. Perhaps Georg
can give it a try to confirm that this still works.
Is there any other test that needs to be done after "porting" them to
generic board?
Thanks
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/11/2015 09:34 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> Hello Michal
>>
>> Thanks for your reply
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 05/09/2015 06:24 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>>>> Hello Michal and Stefan
>>>>
>>>> Could you provide some context about why are we removing this? Virtex
>>>> 5 (and V4) are not yet in their end of life.
>>>
>>> I was checking this internally and ppc is not supported by tools for
>>> several releases (roughly ~2 years). All support from tools was already
>>> removed.
>>
>> Virtex5 is only supported by ise/edk, not vivado. This is why the
>> tools from the last two years does not support ppc.
>
> It is also about SDK where that support was removed.
>
>> I think that the position from xilinx was to support ise for as long
>> as v5, s6... was on sale.
>>
>> http://forums.xilinx.com/t5/Implementation/VIrtex-5-and-Vivado-HSL/td-p/250930
>
> One thing was support design tools and the next was to support the
> latest SW.
> Anyway this is Virtex5 - ppc440. Any intention to keep ppc405 alive?
>
>
>>> There is no testing on it done for a long time that's why this platform
>>> is obsolete from my point of view.
>>
>> We still use it actively on the fpga family of our productsm and cisco
>> uses quite a lot of virtex5 :)
>>
>> Also avnet virtex5 boards are still available
>>
>> http://avnetexpress.avnet.com/store/em/EMController?action=products&catalogId=500201&storeId=500201&N=0&langId=-1&slnk=b&term=AES-XLX-V5LX-EVL110-G&hrf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.em.avnet.com%2Fen-us%2Fdesign%2Fdrc%2FPages%2FXilinx-Virtex-5-LX-Evaluation-Kit.aspx&intcmp=EMA-BUY-AES-XLX-V5LX-EVL110-G
>
> ok. I really have no problem to let you support these boards. :-)
>
>>>
>>>> The plan is to re-factor the code for this platform or just drop all
>>>> the support?
>>>
>>> Platform needs to be moved to generic board support and none from xilinx
>>> will do it. If you want to invest your time and support these boards
>>> feel free to do it but from my perspective we should just remove it
>>> because it is just old and make no sense to waste our time on it.
>>
>> Give me a couple of days and I will be able to answer to that question.
>>
>> If the patch can wait a bit before it is merged it will be great.
>
> Definitely it can wait but it has to be moved and test for generic board
> support.
>
>>>
>>>> There are also yocto layers that support ml507 and ml405
>>>> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-xilinx-community/tree/conf/machine
>>>
>>> I am not yocto guy but from cgit it looks like that it is pretty old
>>> too. ppc support 4 years ago, ml507 2 years ago.
>>
>> Last change for virtex5 is from 2014.
>
> :-) really just make no sense for me to keep these things alive because
> we are not testing it at all.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
--
Ricardo Ribalda
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
