Hi Albert, On 5 May 2015 at 01:17, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.arib...@3adev.fr> wrote: > Bonjour Simon, > > Le Mon, 4 May 2015 15:37:22 -0600, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> a > écrit : > >> On 4 May 2015 at 13:55, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> wrote: >> > We really don't want boards defining fixed MAC addresses in their config >> > so we just remove the option to set it in a fixed way. If you must have >> > a MAC address that was not provisioned, then use the random MAC address >> > functionality. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> >> > --- >> >> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > As much as I support the idea that one should not hard-code MAC > addresses, I also support the idea that changes should not break > previous behavior. > > And regarding the WORK board which I submitted, its configuration > header file had this address encoded in the in-house U-Boot which > the customer was using before; removing this address might lead to > the customer provisioning scripts failing.
Shouldn't this be done with either MAC address or CONFIG_BOOTP_VCI_STRING or similar? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
