Hi Hans, On 4 May 2015 at 11:19, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Here is v3 of my patch to fix the maxpacketsize0 not being set issue I > found and related issues. > > I've added a big fat comment to explain that the usb_device pointer is a > hack and should not be used outside of usb-uclass.c as requested. > > I hope this version is to your liking and you can ack it. > > Assuming that you do ack it, then my entire dm-usb fixes + ehci set is > all acked, and the question becomes how to take uit upstream, I can take > the entire set upstream through the sunxi tree, or you can take it > upstream through the dm tree. Let me know which way you prefer to move > forward with this.
I should probably take it through DM. I'll do a pull request once the x86 pull request goes in. But I'm still not sure how it is safe to pass a pointer to a local stack variable out through another function. Can you please explain that? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot