Hey Masahiro > -----Original Message----- > From: Masahiro Yamada [mailto:yamada.masah...@socionext.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 4:46 > To: Yehuda Yitschak > Cc: Simon Glass; Hanna Hawa; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] switching to single .config configuration issues > > Hi Yehuda, > > > 2015-04-29 14:23 GMT+09:00 Yehuda Yitschak <yehu...@marvell.com>: > > Hey Simon, Masahiro > > > > May I suggest an alternative solution to this issue. > > > > What if each Kconfigs option could be set as "y" (compile for u-boot > > only )or "s" (compile for u-boot and SPL) Just as the kernel can set Kconfig > to "y" or "m". > > > > With minor modifications to the Makefile, SPL target will compile "obj-s" > and u-boot target will compile "obj-s" and "obj-y" > > > > What do you think ? > > > Interesting. > > A little comments. > > - Is there any possibility that some files should be compiled for SPL only? > (I do not think we have much.) > > Perhaps, obj-y : for U-boot only > obj-s : for SPL only > oby-ys: for both > I am not sure..
How about "a" (as in all targets) instead of "sy". It will look better in the menuconfig square brackets Maybe TPL should also be added as "t" option. > > - This idea is only applicable for bool options. > We still have to keep duplication for int/hex options such as > CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE. > > But, this idea will help clean up much because most of configs are boolean. > > > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: s...@google.com [mailto:s...@google.com] On Behalf Of Simon > Glass > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:06 > >> To: Hanna Hawa > >> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Yehuda Yitschak; Masahiro Yamada > >> Subject: Re: switching to single .config configuration issues > >> > >> +Masahiro (new address) > >> > >> Hi Hanna, > >> > >> On 27 April 2015 at 07:43, Hanna Hawa <han...@marvell.com> wrote: > >> > Hi everyone, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I’m working on the latest u-boot 2015.04 trying to rebase my > >> > repository to latest code. > >> > >> I would suggest going with upstream/master (targeting 2015.07) since > >> there are several driver model changes since 2015.04 (USB, PCI, > >> Ethernet). There are still patches going in but the bulk of it should be > there. > >> > >> > > >> > And I have question regarding patch e02ee2548afe (kconfig: switch > >> > to single .config configuration) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Issues that I face in the current solution (single .config): > >> > > >> > For my usage most of the CONFIG options will not supported in the > >> > SPL, we need the SPL very tiny and most of the CONFIG will be > >> > enabled in the u-boot, need to undef/disable(set=n) for every > >> > CONFIG in scripts/Makefile.uncmd_spl/ include/config_uncmd_spl.h > >> > > >> > Also for future usage if we want to delete the defines of the > >> > commands from the include file and move it to defconfig file, then > >> > need to undef them in the SPL code. > >> > >> Masahiro is the expert here. The idea is to use SPL-specific options for > SPL. > >> For example CONFIG_SPL_I2C_SUPPORT. This is much the same as before. > >> > >> I suggest you create some SPL options for your new features, so that > >> they are only enabled in SPL when you want them. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Do you planning for another solution for this issue? > >> > >> Also, if you push your tree to github (or somewhere) I or Masahiro > >> might be able to comment on specifics. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Simon > > _______________________________________________ > > U-Boot mailing list > > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > > > > -- > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
