Hi Simon,
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Simon Glass <s...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi Ajay,
>
> On 8 December 2014 at 15:40, Simon Glass <s...@google.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ajay,
>>
>>
>> On 7 December 2014 at 22:43, Ajay kumar <ajayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Minkyu,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Ajay kumar <ajayn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Minkyu Kang <proms...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Dear Ajay Kumar,
>>> >>
>>> >> On 5 December 2014 at 23:13, Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar...@samsung.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Add get_lcd_clk and set_lcd_clk callbacks for Exynos5800 needed by
>>> >>> exynos video driver.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar...@samsung.com>
>>> >>> ---
>>> >>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 63
>>> >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>> >>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 ++
>>> >>> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> >>> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> >>> index 8fab135..1a34ad6 100644
>>> >>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> >>> @@ -1066,6 +1066,36 @@ static unsigned long
>>> >>> exynos5420_get_lcd_clk(void)
>>> >>> return pclk;
>>> >>> }
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +static unsigned long exynos5800_get_lcd_clk(void)
>>> >>> +{
>>> >>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>> >>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>> >>> + unsigned long sclk;
>>> >>> + unsigned sel;
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> just unsigned? why don't you specify in detail?
>>> I will fix this.
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>> + unsigned ratio;
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> + sel = (readl(&clk->src_disp10) >> 4) & 7;
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> please add comment how you get "sel" from disp10.
>>> >> and if 7 means mask then please use 0x7. it looks more clearly.
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> >> +
>>> >>> + /*
>>> >>> + * Mapping of CLK_SRC_DISP10 CLKMUX_FIMD1 [6:4] values into
>>> >>> + * PLLs. The first element is a placeholder to bypass the
>>> >>> + * default settig.
>>> >>> + */
>>> >>> + const int reg_map[] = {0, CPLL, DPLL, MPLL, SPLL,
>>> >>> + IPLL, EPLL, RPLL};
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> please don't define local variable at middle of function.
>>> >> you can move it to top of the function or
>>> >> it seems to use sel is true then you can move it into the if statement.
>>> I will move this to the top of the function.
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>> + if (sel)
>>> >>> + sclk = get_pll_clk(reg_map[sel]);
>>> >>> + else
>>> >>> + sclk = 24000000;
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> please define this value.
>>> Ok.
>>>
>>> >>
>>> >>> + /*
>>> >>> + * CLK_DIV_DISP10
>>> >>> + * FIMD1_RATIO [3:0]
>>> >>> + */
>>> >>> + ratio = readl(&clk->div_disp10) & 0xf;
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> + return sclk / (ratio + 1);
>>> >>> +}
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> void exynos4_set_lcd_clk(void)
>>> >>> {
>>> >>> struct exynos4_clock *clk =
>>> >>> @@ -1197,6 +1227,31 @@ void exynos5420_set_lcd_clk(void)
>>> >>> writel(cfg, &clk->div_disp10);
>>> >>> }
>>> >>>
>>> >>> +void exynos5800_set_lcd_clk(void)
>>> >>> +{
>>> >>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>> >>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>> >>> + unsigned int cfg;
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> + /*
>>> >>> + * Use RPLL for pixel clock
>>> >>> + * CLK_SRC_DISP10 CLKMUX_FIMD1 [6:4]
>>> >>> + * ==================
>>> >>> + * 111: SCLK_RPLL
>>> >>> + */
>>> >>> + cfg = readl(&clk->src_disp10) | (7 << 4);
>>> >>> + writel(cfg, &clk->src_disp10);
>>> >>> +
>>> >>> + /*
>>> >>> + * CLK_DIV_DISP10
>>> >>> + * FIMD1_RATIO [3:0]
>>> >>> + */
>>> >>> + cfg = readl(&clk->div_disp10);
>>> >>> + cfg &= ~(0xf << 0);
>>> >>> + cfg |= (0 << 0);
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> it looks meaningless.
>>> Why not?
>>> I agree that the calculation can be skipped, and directly FIMD
>>> clock divider can be set to 0. But, I prefer to keep the readability.
>>> In fact, similar "meaningless" code is already part of the tree:
>>>
>>> http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-samsung.git;a=blob;f=arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c;h=8fab135bebf4ef6900677847b60a8e1a1520254c;hb=HEAD#l1194
>>
>>
>> Well perhaps a #define for the shift value? Then it would mean something.
>>
>> Also this can probably use clrsetbits_le32().
>
> This is one of four patches that I think were never applied and need a
> respin. Are you able to do that? Then Pi LCD will work OK I think.
Yes, I am respinning this patch. Also, trying to move out GPIOs from
smdk5420.c. Will be posting them tomorrow.
Ajay
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418116/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418117/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418118/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/418119/
>
> Regards.
> Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
