Hi Marek, On 19 February 2015 at 07:34, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 03:29:52 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Marek, > > Hi Simon, > >> On 19 February 2015 at 01:50, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> > On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 02:06:38 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> On 18 February 2015 at 14:36, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> >> > Since device_unbind() is also defined in device-remove.c, >> >> > which is compiled in only in case CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE >> >> > is defined, protect the device_unbind() prototype with the >> >> > same CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE check. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> >> >> > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> >> > Cc: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> >> >> > Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> >> >> > --- >> >> > >> >> > include/dm/device-internal.h | 4 ++++ >> >> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> >> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> > >> > Tom, can you please pick this one, I need it to repair the socfpga, >> > so I'd like to have it in before I submit new PR for that. >> >> I'll bring it into u-boot-dm in any case. >> >> I didn't see a build error though? What is broken at present? > > Try building u-boot-socfpga/master . The patches there enable DT > (CONFIG_OF_CONTROL) on SoCFPGA always. And in case this is enabled, > the Cadence SPI and DW SPI drivers are compiled in. But those two > drivers require CONFIG_DM and CONFIG_DM_SPI ... and spi-uclass.c > contains calls to device_unbind() .
Ah OK, so this a problem you have seen in new patches, not in mainline. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot