On 17:35 Fri 26 Jun , Richard Stallman wrote: > > The other systems that you speak of are not consumer products, so this > > requirement in GPLv3 does not apply to them. > in a Point of payment terminal it does not apply are sure? > > I am sure. Those are not consumer products. They are made for > businesses only. Wrong, as example your cell phone can be a part of the PPT, and your also have product on the market that allow you to use a PPT at home instead of just write your credit card number on a website. So your definition of consumer produts is dangerous and will not fit at all because you can not known what we can create > > You seem to be worried about something you haven't described clearly. > > I think you're afraid of shadows, but since you have not described > > them clearly, I really don't know. > as example with the v3 you force me to give you my private key that I use > to protect the product this is not acceptable > > To deny the key to the user is not acceptable. It makes the software > non-free, and gives the developer power over the user that nobody > should have. Certanly not, it will make the product not hackable certanly not the software non-free.
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot