On Thursday, January 08, 2015 at 06:23:55 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-01-15 18:06, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, January 08, 2015 at 05:16:53 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 01/08/2015 01:34 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> Hi, > > > > Hi! > > > >>> On 08-01-15 01:19, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>>> On 01/07/2015 04:35 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, January 06, 2015 at 06:02:57 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>> <snip> > >>> > >>>>>> Should we rename "usb reset" to "usb restart"? > >>>>> > >>>>> No, let's not mess with the UI any more than we already did. > >>>> > >>>> Well, it might not be such a bad idea if the semantics are changing, > >>>> to give people a heads-up? > >>> > >>> Only the semantics of "usb start" are changing, and you are suggesting > >>> renaming "usb reset" which remains unchanged ... > >> > >> Yes, that's true. So I suppose we should indeed not rename anything. > > > > OK, let's go with this approach now. > > So we are all in agreement, good, so through who's tree are these 2 > patches going to go upstream ? Note I can take them upstream through > the sunxi tree, but the usb tree seems better to me ...
I can pick them, shall I pick them as they are ? Are they for -next or current ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
