On Saturday 20 June 2009 07:30:41 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 07:08 Sat 20 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 06:40:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 06:18 Sat 20 Jun , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 05:33:26 Jean-Christophe wrote: > > > > > This patch moves the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel > > > > > Makefile to the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for > > > > > the ARM architecture to move away from including libgcc function > > > > > and only using self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux. > > > > > > > > why not change the top level Makefile to read: > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC ?= ... > > > > > > > > then any board/arch that doesnt want it can simply do: > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC = # dont want it > > > > > > because you need to provide the equivalent functions for standalone > > > application and api and U-Boot ofcourse > > > > so move it to config.mk. this doesnt change the important point: leave > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC default in the toplevel common files. what i proposed > > doesnt limit what you want to do with arm in any way. > > I think it's better to let it at arch level and force any new arch adding > to manage it instead provide a default one
considering most arches want this code, i dont think so. you're proposing we duplicate the same common code in all arches to support one deviating arch -- arm. the defaults should reflect the common state while the deviating ones change the behavior as they like. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
