Hi Simon, On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 16 December 2014 at 03:01, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> To avoid having two microcode formats, adjust the build system to support >>> obtaining the microcode from the device tree, even in the case where it >>> must be made available before the device tree can be accessed. >>> >>> Also move the microcode for queensbay (unfortunately the wrong version). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Update microcode file to version 5_cv >>> - Drop patches that have already been applied >>> >>> Makefile | 4 +- >>> arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/M0220661105.inc | 1288 >>> ---------------------------- >>> arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/tnc_car.S | 11 +- >>> arch/x86/dts/crownbay.dts | 7 + >>> arch/x86/dts/microcode/m0220661105_cv.dtsi | 366 ++++++++ >>> 5 files changed, 380 insertions(+), 1296 deletions(-) >>> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/queensbay/M0220661105.inc >>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/dts/microcode/m0220661105_cv.dtsi >>> > [snip] >>> -- >> >> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >> >> Tested on Intel Crown Bay >> >> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > > This patch is for you, I cannot apply it as it depends on one of your > patches. If I apply your patch then it breaks the build. > > So it would be best if you squashed this patch into one of yours. I'll > push everything to x86/master (except the microcode patch which needs > another rev) ready for you to rebase your patches. > > Regards, > Simon
This patch is integrated into my series @ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/422192/. Thanks! Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
