Hi Masahiro, On 15 December 2014 at 09:55, Masahiro YAMADA <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > 2014-10-15 19:38 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: >> Unfortunately 'unsigned long long' and 'uint64_t' are not necessarily >> compatible on 64-bit machines. Use the correct typedef instead of >> writing the supposed type out in full. > > I doubt this statement. > > I think "unsigned long long" always has 64bit width. > > (C specification guarantees that the width of "unsigned long long" > is greater or equal to 64 bit) > > Could you tell me which toolchain violates it?
Some compilers use 'unsigned long' and some use 'unsigned long long'. I think that is the core of the problem. We don't have a problem with unsigned long long not being at least 64-bit. I wonder whether some toolchains use 128-bit for this? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
