Hi Luca,
On 12.12.2014 13:40, Luca Ellero wrote:
On 10.12.2014 09:24, Luca Ellero wrote:
There is only one pio_word in this DMA transaction so data field must
be 1.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ellero <luca.ell...@brickedbrain.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
index 7a064ab..616c9ca 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxs_nand.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static void mxs_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info
*mtd, int data, unsigned int ctrl)
d->cmd.data =
MXS_DMA_DESC_COMMAND_DMA_READ | MXS_DMA_DESC_IRQ |
MXS_DMA_DESC_CHAIN | MXS_DMA_DESC_DEC_SEM |
- MXS_DMA_DESC_WAIT4END | (3 << MXS_DMA_DESC_PIO_WORDS_OFFSET) |
+ MXS_DMA_DESC_WAIT4END | (1 << MXS_DMA_DESC_PIO_WORDS_OFFSET) |
(nand_info->cmd_queue_len << MXS_DMA_DESC_BYTES_OFFSET);
What error or problem does this incorrect setup cause in your case? I'm
asking since I'm also using this driver in some mx6 system and have not
seen any issues.
As far as I can see, it doesn't seem to cause any issue. But, if you
read the iMX6 Reference Manual (chapter 14.2) this field should reflect
the number of PIO_WORDS appended to the DMA command, in this case 1.
Okay. I just wanted to check if this patch fixes a real problem that you
have experienced. Thanks for the explanation.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
