From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>

When an invalid USDHC port is passed we should return -EINVAL instead of 0.
    
Also, return the error immediately on fsl_esdhc_initialize() failure.

Cc: Eric Benard <e...@eukrea.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
---
 board/embest/mx6boards/mx6boards.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/embest/mx6boards/mx6boards.c 
b/board/embest/mx6boards/mx6boards.c
index 02fb3fa..f8c7468 100644
--- a/board/embest/mx6boards/mx6boards.c
+++ b/board/embest/mx6boards/mx6boards.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ int board_mmc_getcd(struct mmc *mmc)
 
 int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
 {
-       s32 status = 0;
+       int ret;
        int i;
 
        /*
@@ -268,13 +268,15 @@ int board_mmc_init(bd_t *bis)
                        printf("Warning: you configured more USDHC controllers"
                               "(%d) then supported by the board (%d)\n",
                               i + 1, CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USDHC_NUM);
-                       return status;
+                       return -EINVAL;
                }
 
-               status |= fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[i]);
+               ret = fsl_esdhc_initialize(bis, &usdhc_cfg[i]);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
        }
 
-       return status;
+       return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to