Dear Daniel Mack, In message <20090604180042.gn26...@buzzloop.caiaq.de> you wrote: > > Ok. I just saw ubifs implementing its own set_bit() functions and > considered that the wrong place for such functions to live in. ext2 > seems to do the same things, also minix. Platforms which want to > enable support for these filesystems have to do an evil #define to > map ext2_set_bit() to the platform specific version. Which is all > bogus, you might agree. And because of that situation, ubifs can't > currently build for anything else than ppc > (according to 'git grep -w fls include/asm*').
Yes, we have a mess here, and we need toclean this up ASAP. I'm trying to find out if there is any agreement what a portable set of I/O and bit macro definitions should look like. > Anyway - applying the first patch of this series would at least prevent > others from being mislead by dead and wrong code. ACK on that. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de There are three ways to get something done: do it yourself, hire someone, or forbid your kids to do it. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
