On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Masahiro YAMADA <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote: ... > So two options here I'd like to suggest > > [1] Every 2 months release with 2 weeks MW > > MW open: 2 weeks > MW closed: 6.5 weeks
I prefer this option however I also want to warn this will impose more active response from custodians. In case of the i.MX we had long delays in review and merges from Stefano from time to time and this would complicate a lot. So for i.MX specific case some patches got merged late and this complicates a lot testing. Mainly because sometimes one tree depends on changes in another and a lack of u-boot-next where all them are automatic merged complicates a full test of upcoming release. p.s: this is not a personal attack but something which is clearly happening. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
