On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:11:54AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > I don't this Albert is the problem, I am starting to suspect we simply lack > > custodian manpower in general. And I also suspect we're not quite inviting > > and attractive crowd, which is something we should discuss too ... > > As I said privately, I believe we have way too many custodians...
I think perhaps I need to better spell out custodian expectations. But as to having too many? No, I need some convincing in that direction. > Anyway, u-boot code looks similar to kernel code, but patch submission > rules are really different. > > Something like this could help..? > Pavel > > --- /dev/null 2014-10-09 01:15:57.354292026 +0200 > +++ doc/SubmittingPatches 2014-10-09 23:58:53.058883776 +0200 > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +Differences from kernel: Perhaps. If not in tree, a concice reminder to follow all of the rules spelled out on the wiki to avoid the ping-ponging you noted in a follow up later. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
