Hi Simon,

On 09/17/14 06:51, Simon Glass wrote:
> GPIOs should be requested before use. Without this, driver model will not
> permit the GPIO to be used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Check return values of gpio_request()
> 
>  arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c |  7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c b/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
> index 70cff5c..aaf6936 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>   * SPDX-License-Identifier:  GPL-2.0+
>   */
>  #include <common.h>
> +#include <malloc.h>
>  #include <asm/arch/clock.h>
>  #include <asm/arch/imx-regs.h>
>  #include <asm/errno.h>
> @@ -72,10 +73,26 @@ static void * const i2c_bases[] = {
>  int setup_i2c(unsigned i2c_index, int speed, int slave_addr,
>             struct i2c_pads_info *p)
>  {
> +     char *name1, *name2;
>       int ret;
>  
>       if (i2c_index >= ARRAY_SIZE(i2c_bases))
>               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     name1 = malloc(9);
> +     name2 = malloc(9);
> +     if (!name1 || !name2)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +     sprintf(name1, "i2c_sda%d", i2c_index);
> +     sprintf(name2, "i2c_scl%d", i2c_index);
> +     ret = gpio_request(p->sda.gp, name1);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto err_req1;
> +
> +     ret = gpio_request(p->scl.gp, name2);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto err_req2;
> +
>       /* Enable i2c clock */
>       ret = enable_i2c_clk(1, i2c_index);
>       if (ret)
> @@ -93,5 +110,12 @@ int setup_i2c(unsigned i2c_index, int speed, int 
> slave_addr,
>  
>  err_idle:
>  err_clk:
> +     gpio_free(p->scl.gp);
> +err_req2:
> +     gpio_free(p->sda.gp);
> +err_req1:
> +     free(name1);
> +     free(name2);
> +
>       return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c
> index 62c625a..10e31b6 100644
> --- a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c
> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c
> @@ -71,8 +71,21 @@ static iomux_v3_cfg_t const sata_pads[] = {
>  
>  static int cm_fx6_setup_issd(void)
>  {
> +     int ret;
> +     int i;
> +
>       SETUP_IOMUX_PADS(sata_pads);
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cm_fx6_issd_gpios); i++) {
> +             ret = gpio_request(cm_fx6_issd_gpios[i], "sata");
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       /* Make sure this gpio has logical 0 value */
> +     ret = gpio_request(CM_FX6_SATA_PWLOSS_INT, "sata_pwloss_int");
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
>       gpio_direction_output(CM_FX6_SATA_PWLOSS_INT, 0);
>       udelay(100);
>  
> @@ -182,6 +195,7 @@ static int cm_fx6_usb_hub_reset(void)
>       }
>  
>       SETUP_IOMUX_PAD(PAD_SD3_RST__GPIO7_IO08 | MUX_PAD_CTRL(NO_PAD_CTRL));
> +     gpio_request(CM_FX6_USB_HUB_RST, "usb_hub_rst");

This is confusing... This GPIO should be already requested
several lines above.

>       gpio_direction_output(CM_FX6_USB_HUB_RST, 0);
>       udelay(10);
>       gpio_direction_output(CM_FX6_USB_HUB_RST, 1);
> @@ -339,6 +353,7 @@ int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis)
>  
>       SETUP_IOMUX_PADS(enet_pads);
>       /* phy reset */
> +     gpio_request(CM_FX6_ENET_NRST, "enet_nrst");

Error check?
This one also should not fail the boot process, just abort the
Ethernet init.

>       gpio_direction_output(CM_FX6_ENET_NRST, 0);
>       udelay(500);
>       gpio_set_value(CM_FX6_ENET_NRST, 1);
> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> index 1f39679..e4d7e2e 100644
> --- a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> @@ -79,6 +79,13 @@ void cm_fx6_set_ecspi_iomux(void)
>  
>  int board_spi_cs_gpio(unsigned bus, unsigned cs)
>  {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = gpio_request(CM_FX6_ECSPI_BUS0_CS0, "ecspi_bus0_cs0");
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +#endif

Is there a reason for excluding this request from spl builds?
We do build with CONFIG_SPL_GPIO_SUPPORT and we don't have a
problem with spl size.
So, if there is no strong reason to exclude it from spl build,
I'd like to remove the #ifndef.

>       return (bus == 0 && cs == 0) ? (CM_FX6_ECSPI_BUS0_CS0) : -1;
>  }
>  #endif
> 

-- 
Regards,
Igor.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to