> The only thing I'd like to discuss is how to name the functions. Naming > the functions board_*() doesn't seem to fit. Cache functionality isn't > really board related. Regarding L2Cache, this is CPU/SoC related. So > maybe omap3_l2cache_*()? actually I'd like to have a better cache management API and you point the board_ does not fit here as the code is soc or arch specific > > Regarding cache_flush()/board_cache_flush() below maybe Jean-Christophe > can help if we have already something generic for this somewhere? If not, > we should use something like omap3_cache_flush(). as we will support only one arch simultany I'll prefer to not specify it's name at all.
you will ask why? The reason is that I do want have a common cache management and a common cleanup before linux so I'll propose l2_cache_flush as done for the Marvell orion for non-l2 cache I prefer to manage it via armvXX as they will be common Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
