On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Nitin Garg <nitin.g...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 09/02/2014 08:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Nitin Garg <nitin.g...@freescale.com> wrote: >> >>> But get_cpu_rev is correct, it returns unsigned int. >>> The problem happens in hab code where there are >>> comparisons between int and unsigned int, hence >> >> Where exactly in the hab code does the problem happen? >> > In the macros of HAB, like: > hab_rvt_report_event_p > > The compiler generates bhi instead of bgt.
However looking at the code I didn't see any negative CHIP_REV: #define CHIP_REV_1_0 0x10 #define CHIP_REV_1_2 0x12 #define CHIP_REV_1_5 0x15 So I am not sure we have a failure case in the U-Boot code now. I think I am missing something though ... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
