Hi Richard,
Richard Retanubun wrote:
> From 584b5fbd4abfc43f920cc1c329633e03816e28be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Richard Retanubun <richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:26:01 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1) loop
> counter.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun <richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com>
> ---
> Hi TC,
>
> Sorry for the long delay, I got tied up in an integration and sw release
> process.
> It turns out that there is only one place that needed changing.
>
> drivers/net/mcfmii.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mcfmii.c b/drivers/net/mcfmii.c
> index 4f1c0a0..4acc29e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mcfmii.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mcfmii.c
> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void __mii_init(void)
> if ((status & linkgood) == linkgood)
> break;
>
> - udelay(500);
> + udelay(1);
> }
> if (i >= MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP) {
> printf("Link UP timeout\n");
> --
> 1.6.2.1
>
I'm not sure if this was meant to be applied, but it doesn't...
Applying Subject: [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a
udelay(1) loop counter.
error: patch failed: drivers/net/mcfmii.c:270
error: drivers/net/mcfmii.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001.
When you have resolved this problem run "git-am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git-am --skip".
regards,
Ben
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
