On Monday, August 25, 2014 at 10:24:19 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> >> On Monday, August 25, 2014 at 07:26:46 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> >>> Tested with an Intel Wireless PCI 7260HMW card:
> >>> 
> >>> U-Boot 2014.10-rc1-16576-g4a8a8a8-dirty (Aug 23 2014 - 16:05:11)
> >>> 
> >>> CPU:   Freescale i.MX6SX rev1.0 at 792 MHz
> >>> Reset cause: WDOG
> >>> Board: MX6SX SABRE SDB
> >>> I2C:   ready
> >>> DRAM:  1 GiB
> >>> MMC:   FSL_SDHC: 0
> >>> 
> >>>   00:01.0     - 16c3:abcd - Bridge device
> >>>   
> >>>    01:00.0    - 8086:08b1 - Network controller
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
> >> 
> >> Should this output be really part of the commit message?
> > 
> > Personally I don't see any problem with it, but if Stefano prefers I
> > can remove it and send a v4.
> 
> I like to have it  included.

Please explain what exactly is the worth of having 50% of commit message 
contain 
standard U-Boot boot output, which is completely unrelated to what the commit 
implements. The rest of the commit message fails to explain what the commit 
does.

I would like to hear your reasoning for your claim.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to