Hi Michal,
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 13:27:27 +0200 Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > In this case, savedefconfig was done based on > > configs/sandbox_defconfig which is empty for now, > > but which will have more options in the future. > > No problem with that. > The question and my concern is that every .config > will contain this line and this is just one usage > which is questionable. IMHO if there is no .config > savedefconfig should failed to let user to know > that something is wrong. But that's just my opinion. Finally, I have posted a patch. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/380400/ > > > > Whereas, this case, savedefconfig failed, > > that is why the file is empty. > > It doesn't look at it is failing - just don't use that default one. You are right. It seems to exit successfully with doing nothing. Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
