On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 02:19:34PM -0700, York Sun wrote: > On 08/08/2014 02:12 PM, Tom Rini wrote: [snip] > > Oh I'm sure, but maybe we can help get everyone a better script. For > > example, you've said the way your job goes currently is every commit > > gets a test. But.. that's not what you need exactly it sounds like. It > > sounds like you need a given gerrit issue, which can have a few commits > > to it, to be bisectable and compile tested. buildman will handle this > > part for you, if you let it. > > > Tom, > > I agree buildman has improvements comparing with MAKEALL. I spent time > to make Gerrit, Jenkins and MAKEALL work together. It is not easy as > one would expect. For now, if I can make builmand to build the last > commit, I can replace MAKEALL with buildman. But that seems not > working.
I believe you, I've spent a bunch of time inside of Jenkins myself (and then with IBM's LSF compute setup) and I'm doing some of the same hoop-jumping now too. But I'm hoping maybe we can all take this as a chance to improve the various ad-hoc builder setups many of us have. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
