On Thursday, August 07, 2014 at 11:36:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jeroen, > > In message <53e3ec54.4090...@myspectrum.nl> you wrote: > > >>>> So the argument about incompatible licenses is valid here. Should > > >>>> u-boot switch to GPLv3 you need to hunt down that file again and > > >>>> this > > >>> > > >>> You would have to rewrite the major part of U-Boot or to cripple it > > >> > > >> noise ^ not > > >> > > >>> to uselessness if you try to release it under GPLv3. I cannot see > > >>> anybody investing any efforts in that direction; all these threads > > >>> about a potential GPLv3 switch are just a hollow scarecrow. > > > > > > sorry, can't parse that. > > > > no, this was nicely formatted in my mail editor. Just wanted to point out > > you forgot a "not". You mentioned "to cripple it" you more then like ment > > "to _not_ cripple it". But the whitespace got lost along the way. > > No, I did NOT forget a "not". > > There is an awful lot of GPLv2 (V2 only) code in U-Boot.
OK, so we need a GPLv2-compatible header file. That's the conclusion. Can we get one or how shall we proceed in the opposite case please? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
