On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 17:35 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08/04/2014 04:27 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 01:37:54PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > [snip] > >> We had multiple entries in boards.cfg per board > >> (with some differences in the options field) > >> and I generated the correspoing defconfig files. > >> > >> But I guess it would be painful to maintain lots of defconfigs. > >> > >> I expect board maintainers will consolidate defconfigs like you are > >> trying to do, and eventually, we will have one defconfig per board in > >> the future. > > > > So I was thinking about this a bit this morning since I have lots of > > defconfigs I want to merge together as well (see am335x_evm*). I > > suspect the answer is board maintainers will want a README in their > > directory. But today we're inconsistent in a few places. First, it's > > most often board/.../README but we have a few README.somethings (I'm > > guilty there too. And despite 702e601 we have some board-level (I'd > > consider at least) details in docs/ still. > > > > Would board/sunxi/README work for the sunxi cases? Or is that going to > > get too unwieldy? > > board/sunxi/README will work fine for sunxi documentation as far as I > can see right now.
A bunch of the sort of thing I imaging would be there probably ought instead to go into Kconfig help sections for the symbols which they are documenting. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
