>>> Firstly we need to establish that GPIOs have names and that these should >>>be supported in U-Boot. Without agreement on this point we might not get >>> much further. >> >> Can I please press you on this point, as it is important to establish >> this first. > > Oh, you were talking about agreeing with me? I thought this was more of a > general comment, since you'd indicated earlier that amending the gpio to > handle names was outside the scope of this patchset, and GPIO names are > basically only relevant if the user-interface exposes/handles the names.
Yeah, but that applied to my request to use names that were derived and identified by those strings/names supplied in the DTS files. jdl _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
