Hi Stephen,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 17:05:21 -0600 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 07/29/2014 11:08 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > This commit enables Kconfig. > > Going forward, we use Kconfig for the board configuration. > > mkconfig will never be used. Nor will include/config.mk be generated. > > > > Kconfig must be adjusted for U-Boot because our situation is > > a little more complicated than Linux Kernel. > > We have to generate multiple boot images (Normal, SPL, TPL) > > from one source tree. > > Each image needs its own configuration input. > > > > Usage: > > > > Run "make <board>_defconfig" to do the board configuration. > > This is quite unfortunate; it breaks any scripts that were building U-Boot > via "make <board>_config; make". Can't we add another rule to allow the old > build commands to work? Technically, yes. I think we can. But I do not like having it permanently. So, we support both *_defconfig and *_config for a while (maybe 6 months or so?) and then remove *_config. Deal? > Otherwise, I guess I'll have to hack my scripts to check whether e.g. > scripts/multiconfig.py (which was added in this commit) is present in the > tree, and execute different build commands based on that... Do you mean, you need to build some different versions of U-boot ? Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
