On 07/14/2014 07:03 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Unfortunately I don't have an answer to that; the arm64 Linux spin-table > documentation and code were all written before I was involved. > > The unfortunate truth is that a lot of the ARM DT and boot unification > work was done somewhat blindly, with many subtleties being lost. Someone > implemented spin-table with a shared address because it happened to be > easier, and then it got copied. Now that people are actively using it > it's not possible to remove it, and it's difficult to dissuade others > from following the crowd. > > If U-Boot provides each CPU with its own unique address, then that would > be fantastic, and certainly avoids one nasty edge-case.
In the patch set I sent for review, each CPU has its own spin table. It has an option to use a single release address, or individual release address. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
