> > If someone really wants such a trial and error approach, he can still
> > do this without adding code that affects everybody with just a little
> > scripting - like "bootm $addr || bootz $addr || ...".
>
> That's not the usecase really. The usecase is roughly "I just want to
> boot what the kernel build spit out and not have to guess the command".
>
> How about if we added a new command, 'boota[uto]' to make a few stabs at
> guessing the format? The first problem that pops to mind here is
> passing around some flag to make sure that bootm doesn't get this new
> behaviour.
For the record, boota would be nice. Count me as one of developers
that dislike the extra steps...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
