On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 22:54 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Ian, > > On Sun, 06 Jul 2014 20:22:31 +0100, Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> > wrote: > > > On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 21:18 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > > > > Slightly off-topic, but... When you provide some code excerpt, you > > > should make sure it doesn't look like a git patch, because if it does, > > > then our Patchwork, which reads the list, will think it is actually a > > > patch submission: > > > > I suppose this was a submission, although I was mostly planning to short > > circuit it straight into the appropriate branch. > > Hmm, short-circuiting a code change is risky -- all U-Boot code should > go through the list and be reviewed.
Oh, I didn't mean to suggest skipping all that good stuff, just that the patch is already in a local branch ready to go when it is acked so I don't need to fetch it from patchwork. Getting it reviewed was why I posted it. > If your post was a submission, then it should be the pure result of a > git format-patch or of a patman command. The thing I posted was the output of git format-patch. > > How much do I need to corrupt something before patchwork will ignore it? > > Basically, if you can (try to) 'git apply' the post, chances are PW > will consider it a submission. I think that is what I wanted on this occasion. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
