Dear Sudhakar, In message <1402711264164-182331.p...@n7.nabble.com> you wrote: > > Suppose, say I add more functions to export/_export.h files and call it from > standalone application. But if I release only the u-boot binary and don't > release the binary of the standalone application should the standalone > application source need to be released under GPL?
If you do not distribute copies of the code, you do not have to release the source code for it. The requirements of the GPL for providing the source code are only for the situation when distri- bute the code. Note however that you would have to be extremely careful - you would have to make very prominet notice in the documentation and the source code that the license exception for Standalone appliations does NOT apply for your modified version of the U-Boot source code. The big problem is that someone could use your extended jump table as base for his own legacy SA applications, while this would be incorrect. May I ask what exactly you are trying to do that triggers these questions? What is the intellectual property in your AS app that appears to be so critical that you cannot release the code under GPL? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three men, two of them absent. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
