On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:35:51AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Am 05.06.2014 21:15, schrieb Tom Rini: > >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:33:35AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > > >>move fdtdec_get_int() out of lib/fdtdec.c into lib/fdtdec_common.c > >>as this function is also used, if CONFIG_OF_CONTROL is not > >>used. Poped up on the ids8313 board using signed FIT images, > >>and activating CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD. Without this patch > >>it shows on boot: > >> > >>No valid FDT found - please append one to U-Boot binary, use u-boot-dtb.bin > >>or define CONFIG_OF_EMBED. For sandbox, use -d<file.dtb> > >> > >>With this patch, it boots again with CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD > >>enabled. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de> > >>Acked-by: Simon Glass<s...@chromium.org> > >>Cc: Tom Rini<tr...@ti.com> > > > >The problem is that on architectures with old compilers (sparc, > >blackfin, nds32) this doesn't get discarded due to not being used but > >instead causes link errors. Can you figure out which option > >(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE I suspect) drives this need and make sure we > >include fdtdec_common.o then? Thanks! > > I look into it ... but I think it is not only one config option, > as this code is not FIT specific and used also for code which > uses DT ... (maybe CONFIG_OF_CONTROL or CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE).
That's fine, we can have multiple obj-$(CONFIG_...) += fdtdec_common.o (or rename it to fdtdec_get_int.o?). But.. how is this only a runtime not link time failure? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
