On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:21:21PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 11:48 +0000, Gupta, Pekon wrote: > > Hello Scott, Tom, > > > > > > >From: Gupta, Pekon > > > > > >*changes v4 -> v5* > > >[PATCH 1/5] <no change> > > >[PATCH 2/5] fixed compilation error for OMAP3 platforms > > >[PATCH 3/5] <no change> > > >[PATCH 4/5] dropped old [PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: add > > >CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BUSWIDTH_16BIT to > > >indicate NAND device bus-width > > > instead new [PATCH] mtd: nand: omap: add > > > CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BUSWIDTH_16BIT to indicate > > >NAND device bus-width > > >[PATCH 5/5] additional cleanup in include/configs/cm_t35.h > > >Build tested for: MAKEALL -s am33xx -s omap3 -s omap4 -s omap5 > > >Rebased above series: > > >http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-April/177323.html > > > > > > > This series few other patch series are awaiting response from > > long time. > > Sorry for the delay -- I've been fairly busy, and don't usually get > around to processing U-Boot patches until after the merge window closes. > The IRC channel topic has been lying and saying the merge window is > still open (also, http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/ReleaseCycle says that > the merge window is open and will close in negative 24 days).
Bah, I always forget to update those parts as well, beyond the actual releases... > Given that I don't do much with NAND myself these days, that the patch > volume is higher than when I started as NAND custodian, and that I now > have maintainership duties in Linux competing for my time, I'm wondering > if someone else (maybe you or Heiko?) wants to step into the NAND > custodian role. It's been a pleasure working with you. Pekon? Heiko? Either of you interested in this particular role? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
