From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>

There's no reason to believe that an MMC device will incorrectly report
its capacity. Remove error checking of this value from ums_disk_init()
to simplify it.

Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marc...@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
---
 board/samsung/common/ums.c | 9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/samsung/common/ums.c b/board/samsung/common/ums.c
index d78c8e763a5d..14e3640e355f 100644
--- a/board/samsung/common/ums.c
+++ b/board/samsung/common/ums.c
@@ -38,16 +38,9 @@ static struct ums ums_dev = {
 
 static struct ums *ums_disk_init(struct mmc *mmc)
 {
-       uint64_t mmc_end_sector = mmc->capacity / SECTOR_SIZE;
-
-       if (!mmc_end_sector) {
-               error("MMC capacity is not valid");
-               return NULL;
-       }
-
        ums_dev.block_dev = &mmc->block_dev;
        ums_dev.start_sector = 0;
-       ums_dev.num_sectors = mmc_end_sector;
+       ums_dev.num_sectors = mmc->capacity / SECTOR_SIZE;
 
        printf("UMS: disk start sector: %#x, count: %#x\n",
               ums_dev.start_sector, ums_dev.num_sectors);
-- 
1.8.1.5

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to