On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >> #define PAD_CTL_HYS (1 << 16) >> +#define PAD_CTL_LVE (1 << 17) >> +#define PAD_CTL_LVE_BIT (1 << 22) > > This conflicts with: > > #define NO_PAD_CTRL (1 << 17)
Correct, I missed the NO_PAD_CTRL definition. > > I have changed the MASK as: > > -#define MUX_PAD_CTRL_MASK ((iomux_v3_cfg_t)0x3ffff << > MUX_PAD_CTRL_SHIFT) > +#define MUX_PAD_CTRL_MASK ((iomux_v3_cfg_t)0x43ffff << > MUX_PAD_CTRL_SHIFT) > > and seems to work fine. Do you see any issue? Changing this mask will alter the layout of the bitfield definitions and will affect the other fields: * * IOMUX/PAD Bit field definitions * * MUX_CTRL_OFS: 0..11 (12) * PAD_CTRL_OFS: 12..23 (12) * SEL_INPUT_OFS: 24..35 (12) * MUX_MODE + SION: 36..40 (5) * PAD_CTRL + NO_PAD_CTRL: 41..58 (18) * SEL_INP: 59..62 (4) * reserved: 63 (1) */ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
