Hi Masahiro,
On 21 April 2014 19:00, Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:02:20 -0600
> Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 21 April 2014 03:39, Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
>> > Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/
>> > or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory.
>> > Now this rule is obsolete.
>> >
>> > It looks weird that sandbox defines "vendor" and "board" just for
>> > meeting the old U-Boot directory structure.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com>
>> > Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>> > ---
>> > Simon,
>> >
>> > I moved board/sandbox/sandbox/sandbox.c to arch/sandbox/lib/sandbox.c
>> >
>> > But if there is a more suitable place or file-name, please move.
>>
>> I like the README move, but I worry about not having a sandbox board,
>> from the point of view of discoverability. How will people find it?
>
> I am not sure if this is necessary.
>
> I just personaly thought the board directory seems odd for Sandbox
> because it is not a real board.
>
> If you don't like this patch, feel free to reject it.
I think it is better to have board/sandbox. Is it possible to have a
null vendor, so we don't need board/sandbox/sandbox?
Regards,
Simon
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards
> Masahiro Yamada
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
