On Thursday, April 10, 2014 at 07:08:06 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> add a possibility to add a medium specific polltimeout
> function. So it is possible to define different
> poll timeouts.
> 
> Used on nand medium, for setting the DFU_MANIFEST_POLL_TIMEOUT
> only on nand ubi partitions, which is currently the only
> usecase.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.p...@samsung.com>
> Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pa...@antoniou-consulting.com>

[...]

> @@ -174,6 +174,17 @@ static void dnload_request_flush(struct usb_ep *ep,
> struct usb_request *req) req->length, f_dfu->blk_seq_num);
>  }
> 
> +static void dfu_set_poll_timeout_manifest(struct dfu_status *dstat,
> +                                       struct f_dfu *f_dfu)
> +{
> +     struct dfu_entity *dfu = dfu_get_entity(f_dfu->altsetting);
> +
> +     if (dfu->poll_timeout)
> +             dfu_set_poll_timeout(dstat, dfu->poll_timeout(dfu));
> +     else
> +             dfu_set_poll_timeout(dstat, DFU_MANIFEST_POLL_TIMEOUT);
> +}

Don't you think it'd be better (yet more intrusive) to have all the DFU users 
have default implementation of dfu->poll_timeout() ? Then you'd be able to 
avoid 
this if and even get rid of this dfu_set_poll_timeout_manifest() function.


[...]

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to