On Thursday, April 03, 2014 at 09:46:22 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi Marek, > > > On Wednesday, April 02, 2014 at 08:35:33 AM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > Hi Mateusz, > > > > [...] > > > > > Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majew...@samsung.com> > > > > I suggest this goes for -next. Do you agree? > > I'm fine with this code going to -next. Thanks in advance.
Hm, actually, I see we have open issues with the 04/13 V2 patch (why don't you have default __weak usb_cable_detection() implementation instead of another #ifdef ?). The whole patchset is a mix of completely unrelated things which should go through different trees. Can the patchset be reordered/split in some reasonable chunks ? There are fixes which should go in immediatelly and then features which should go in for -next. btw. please keep custodians on CC of the respective patches. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
