On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:24:24PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > CROSS_COMPILE is generally passed from the command line > or by the environment variable because cross tools > vary from user to user. > > But, having some choices of often used CROSS_COMPILE > seems reasonable. > > $(call cc-cross-prefix, ...) returns the first prefix > where a prefix$(CC) is found in PATH. > > If your cross tools exist in the argument of > $(call cc-cross-prefix, ...), you do not have to > specify it explicitly. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com> > --- > > My question is which cross tools are popular enough > to be added to the list. > > In my opition, arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc is popular > because it is distributed in Ubuntu. > > On the other hand, I am not sure ppc_8xx-gcc is currently > being used. > > Which one should be to added/deleted to our default list. > Your comments are very welcome. > (I am not familiar with compilers very much.) > > > arch/arm/config.mk | 2 +- > arch/microblaze/config.mk | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/config.mk | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Looking at the kernel, mips is a better example of where this becomes a handy thing, over just a "stop passing CROSS_COMPILE". But that includes adding tool-archpref. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
