Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2014, 17:30:54 schrieb Przemyslaw Marczak:
> Changes:
> - lib/rand.c: add call to hw_rand() (depends on CONFIG_RAND_HW_ACCEL)
> - include/common.h: add hw_rand() declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marc...@samsung.com>
> cc: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>
> cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com>
> ---
> include/common.h | 3 +++
> lib/rand.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h
> index 96a45a6..58e2fbc 100644
> --- a/include/common.h
> +++ b/include/common.h
> @@ -836,6 +836,9 @@ void srand(unsigned int seed);
> unsigned int rand(void);
> unsigned int rand_r(unsigned int *seedp);
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RAND_HW_ACCEL
> +unsigned int hw_rand(void);
> +#endif
>
> /* common/console.c */
> int console_init_f(void); /* Before relocation; uses the serial stuff
*/
> diff --git a/lib/rand.c b/lib/rand.c
> index 5c367e1..f534635 100644
> --- a/lib/rand.c
> +++ b/lib/rand.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,11 @@ unsigned int rand_r(unsigned int *seedp)
>
> unsigned int rand(void)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RAND_HW_ACCEL
> + return hw_rand();
> +#else
> return rand_r(&y);
> +#endif
> }
shouldn't we put that into rand_r() and ignore the argument? because then both
users of rand() and rand_r() will benefit from the hardware random generator.
and what does HW_ACCEL mean? is this a real hardware random generator? if this
is the case, wouldn't it make more sense to name it CONFIG_RAND_USE_HW_RNG.
-michael
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
