On 02/13/2014 01:19 PM, Holger Brunck wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 02/13/2014 01:14 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:10:51 +0100, Holger Brunck >>>> >>>> What if a new board/config does not want to use a bootcount limit? >>>> >>> >>> all keymile boards use this and I don't see a usecase now and in the future >>> that >>> a board don't need it, thats why I decided to remove this here. IMHO it >>> makes >>> the code more readable to make only configurable what really needs to be >>> configurable. >> >> Alright. And what about the keymile boards maintainer? >> > > ah I see I missed to set Valentin on CC for this patch serie. Ok I add him for > this discussion. > > @Valentin: Could you Ack this Patch serie or say if something is missing >
I have actually reviewed this series when it was applied in our interanl branch and tested them on most of our kirkwood boards. So for the whole series: Acked-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
